The loose sand was a bog even in four-wheel drive. The road was well used, well churned by traffic, and graded from the margin of a wash. There must be occasions—the infrequent deluge—when the wash recovers the road, but not this dry year. Although I drove slowly, chalky dust from the dried sand made a plume behind me.
I had camped at the end of this wash in the Mohave Desert. The sun was hardly above the hills to the east when I started the drive out. That’s when I saw an old friend tucked against the cliff at the far margin of the wash. The old friend was the rock nettle (Eucnide urens), an endemic of the Mohave Desert. This species of rock nettle likes habitats that are hard against rock. This robust clump—two feet high and four feet long—had inhabited the seam between the wash and the cliff. I have seen Eucnide urens tucked like tongues in mouth-like clefts of vertical stone—the plants rooted only in a black crack throat.
It was 20 years ago this month that I finished my PhD dissertation on Eucnide—it is always a pleasure to see them in the field. Eucnide is a genus of slightly more than two handfuls of species of the southwestern U.S. and Mexico. I had studied the role of developmental evolution in the diversification of flower forms characteristic of the genus. The research tested ideas that early phases of development were more stable than later phases in the course of evolution; I was especially interested in the possibility that modifications instituted early in the course of development could lead to major, but not necessarily disruptive, changes in form.
The eucnides were wonderful, showing a range of ways that flower development from its very earliest phases could be modified by evolution. Within that range of early developmental modifications were changes that had substantial effects on the eventual functional form of the flower, but there were also slight modifications of proportions and growth rates instituted at the very beginning of development that resulted in more subtle changes in those functional forms. The eucnides were especially fascinating because the opening of the petals was very labile to evolutionary change—and these modifications affected the way that petals stood in the open flowers. These variations in petal stance make some flowers look like deep funnels, others like pin-wheels, and still others like tubes, and the differences in shape may have been variants selected by different pollinators, which would have effectively provided the reproductive isolation of the novel forms that set them off on their own evolutionary trajectories.
One of my favorite pieces of the Eucnide story involves self-pollination. We think often of flowers as being cross-pollinated; that is, the female reproductive structures receive pollen from a genetically different individual. Self-pollination occurs when the female reproductive structures are dosed with pollen from stamens in the same flower or from another flower of the same individual plant. Among the eucnides, species that have large flowers have forms that appear effectively to prohibit self-pollination, whereas those species that have small flowers may only self-pollinate (we don’t know yet the relative amounts of self- versus cross-pollination). There are also species of rock nettles that have flowers of intermediate sizes that provide opportunities for cross-pollination at the beginning of their reproductive phases but force self-pollination at the end of the reproductive phase. Among the different species that have these intermediate flower sizes, the opportunities for and timing of cross- versus self-pollination have been varied by interspecific differences in rates of growth of male and female reproductive structures within flowers.
These size-related effects may be very important in evolution. For example, mutations that prolong development and result in larger flowers may result in individuals capable only of cross-pollination. Similarly, mutations that shorten developmental time may result in flowers that are smaller and obligately self-pollinate. Both are changes that could effectively isolate individuals or a group of individuals from reproducing with the rest of the population. Again, such reproductive isolation offers the inception of evolutionary divergence between subpopulations.
We often think of cross-pollination as important because it serves to enhance genetic diversity in populations—and genetic diversity can be critical in times such as environmental degradation or pathogen infestations. Self-pollination can also offer advantages in some environments. For example, it can serve to perpetuate the high degree of adaptation that some plants may have evolved for local environmental conditions. In environments, such as some deserts, where pollinator availability may depend on unreliable rainfall, selection may favor self-pollination or the mixes of cross- and self-pollination that we find in many rock nettles because those modes of pollination relax the importance of pollinators for plant reproduction. Most of the rock nettles that self-pollinate are in harsh deserts of Baja California and other parts of Mexico.
Eucnide urens—the common rock nettle of the Mohave Desert—has large flowers and a pollination system that promotes outcrossing. It is pollinated by large bees of the genus Hesperaspis. Curiously, in Mentzelia, another genus of Loasaceae, the family that also includes Eucnide, there are annual species endemic to the Mohave and Sonoran deserts that have converged in evolution on flowers of roughly the same size and form as those of Eucnide urens. This convergence in flower forms between these two closely related genera may well have been driven by the large bees of the families Halictidae and Mellitidae that they share.
Rather than the rock nettles, Mentzelia now gets attention in my lab. Mentzelia—the blazing star genus—is providing students opportunities to develop deep friendships with wonderful plants.
* * *
The information on pollinators of Eucnide urens and annual mentzelias is from the PhD dissertation of Gilbert Daniels (1970; University of California Los Angeles).